New guidance on achieving stable lifting operations

What is in Guidance on Stability of Lifts?
The paper explains currently available calculation methods, along with relevant explanations, guidance for assumptions on loads and factors, and background information.
The core of the paper is a flow chart for assessing the lifting stability of a rigging arrangement, which also reflects the common workflows of the participating project partners.
Checkpoints and information blocks in the chart enable users to review the rigging plan they have created, to assess its suitability, and to create a framework of boundary conditions.
“The paper also helps the user to identify important factors for assessing the lifting stability and potentially dangerous combinations of them,” Behrens states.
Following step-by-step guidance
In an easy-to-follow systematic approach, the guidance then works through details clarifying steps from the flow chart.

Ensuring the stability of lifting arrangements is of critical importance to mitigate the risk of damage
Guidance is grouped into five steps. Step one involves preparing a draft rigging plan. Step two is to assess whether the rigging points are friction-dependent. Step three is working out if the centre of gravity (CoG) of the rigging arrangement is above the lifting points. Step four, if applicable, is determining and documenting operational limits.
“Step five is to create a final rigging plan complying with the selected criteria, which can then be added to the operational procedure,” Behrens adds.
Comparing methods for stability assessments of lifts
To assist the process, the guidance makes a comprehensive comparison of different methods to assess the stability of lifts.
These methods are the Virtual CoG concept; the Kaps method, which is widely used in the maritime industry; the Nikitin method; and standard and extensive versions of numerical computer simulation methods.

Potentially unstable primary/secondary suspension arrangement
The applicability of these methods for various purposes is discussed. For example, Virtual CoG and Kaps allow users to evaluate the initial stability of the lift, Nikitin provides insight on the stability against the overturning of two-chain suspensions, while numerical computer simulations allow a much more detailed analysis. “The numerical simulations are useful to understand the behaviour of a lift at certain phases of a lifting operation,” explains Sebastian Becker, Team Lead CAD Design, SAL Engineering GmbH.
What should be considered in the stability assessment?
A stable lift is one that remains in a balanced condition, within a safe margin, when subjected to predefined disturbing factors.

Excerpt from the flow diagram
Disturbing factors may include wind force, rigging length tolerance, steering line forces, crane movement, CoG shift, vessel motions and friction at the lifting points.
The guidance paper explains several disturbing factors, together with relevant mathematical equations for calculating their impacts. It presents this material in a way that allows these factors to be incorporated into the calculations for rigging stability assessment.

Comparison of methods to assess stability in lifts
Calculating sliding and effective inclination angles
The sliding angle is the inclination angle at which a lifted cargo starts to slide, and it should never be reached during lifting. The angle depends on the friction between the materials in use, and on the shape of the contact surface. For instance, the effective inclination angle of a belly-slung cylindrical object is significantly different to a conical section.

Example of compilation of wind force and centre of attack
Calculating sliding and effective inclination angles is useful when assessing lifting arrangements that involve friction-dependent lifting points, which exploit the fact that frictional force resists relative motion between surfaces in contact.

Inclination angles for cylindrical and conical objects
“The guidance includes extensive discussion and formulas to calculate theoretical sliding angles for standard cases. Of course, coefficients indicating degrees of friction can vary significantly, and assumptions should be made conservatively,” Becker comments.
Source: DNV